Subscribe
for notifications:
EN
Login / Registration
Guest avatar
Guest
Login to access all features
You can download client for your phone
download on play marketDownload at play market
download talkvio apkAPK file directly
  • Аватар пользователя Útost Alronbem
    4 месяца22 Feb 2026 в 08:11
    RU
    Original language: Русский

    I'm cracking up. AI backs us up more than we think

    Signs that a programming test task was completed by AI:

    • The task was read and fully understood.
    • All its parts were implemented.
    • Typical tools and frameworks for "serious companies" were used.
    • The source code is divided into small, easily readable [by a human] functions.
    • Variables are given clear, informative names.
    • Complex logic is accompanied by [explanatory] comments.
    • Runtime errors are handled, error messages are informative.
    • Source code files are organized adequately.
    • The web interface looks pleasant.
    • The code is covered by tests.
    / 3 / 0
    Ratio of positive and negative votes: 3/0
    Like this post, increate it rating
    Number of comments in this post, click to go to the thread
    Number of views in this post, click to go to the thread
  • Comments
  • Аватар пользователя Весёлая Варюндия
    4 месяца23 Feb 2026 в 08:47
    RU
    Original language: Русский
    So, if I did something using AI and want to hide it, I need to:
    avatar of Útost AlronbemÚtost Alronbem
    Typical tools and frameworks used by “serious companies” are employed.
    ​Remove most of the seriousness from there and replace it with something less serious
    avatar of Útost AlronbemÚtost Alronbem
    The source code is divided into small, easily readable [by a human] functions.
    ​Remove all the separating bits and glue everything into one big chunk
    avatar of Útost AlronbemÚtost Alronbem
    Variables are given clear, informative names.
    ​Instead of x, use, for example, i, and instead of y – k
    avatar of Útost AlronbemÚtost Alronbem
    Complex logic is equipped with [explanatory] comments.
    ​Remove all comments
    avatar of Útost AlronbemÚtost Alronbem
    Runtime errors are handled, error messages are informative.
    ​Rewrite error messages so that everything isn’t so straightforward and clear?


    Well, overall, what’s wrong if a neural network understood a person, as long as everything looks adequate and works correctly? 
    Like this post, increate it rating
  • Аватар пользователя Útost Alronbem
    4 месяца23 Feb 2026 в 09:07
    • author
    RU
    Original language: Русский
    Avatar of user Весёлая Варюндия
    Весёлая Варюндия
    So, if I did something using AI and want to hide it, I need to: ​Remove most of the seriousness...
    avatar of Весёлая ВарюндияВесёлая Варюндия
    ​Rewrite error messages so that everything isn’t so simple and clear?
    ​Don’t output them at all. Not even to the log. Not even with the forced mode "report each sneeze to a separate file" enabled.
    Since common sense has long ceased to be a typical quality of a rational person, only intuition, animalistic instincts, and chanting while beating a tambourine are signs of code created by a human for later debugging by a human.
    avatar of Весёлая ВарюндияВесёлая Варюндия
    ​Well, overall, what’s bad if a neural network understood a person, as long as everything looks adequate and works correctly? 
    ​That’s the point: people haven’t been programming like that for about twenty years, even for themselves, let alone for money.
    ​Well, except for some Czechs and Croatians.
    ​I don’t know what local alcohol they consume, but it seems that it helps them resist this contagion and churn out benchmark-quality code just to spite everyone.
    ​Even when they mess up, it’s at least fixable.
    (The incident with Gleb is an organizational bottleneck, not a programmer’s issue...)
    avatar of Весёлая ВарюндияВесёлая Варюндия
    ​Instead of x, make, for example, i, and instead of y – k
    ​You, by the way, gave a good example.
    ​In mathematics, it’s customary that the first unknown is always x. e is always e. The imaginary unit is always i.
    ​But as soon as a programmer shows up nearby, it turns out that
    i == e
    ​and the number Pi, depending on where and how the formula was run, is sometimes 3, sometimes 4.
    ​If, God forbid, such chaos didn’t happen – then it was definitely not designed by a human...
    ​Although, one would think that without at least the basics of algebra there’s nothing to do in programming. Yet somehow they get by...
    Like this post, increate it rating
Talkvio Engine 0.2.0-1520-g5d7c815
X
0.2.0-1520-g5d7c815